Skip to content 
The Story
Imagine you’re at a dinner party with 12 people trying to decide what to order. Three people want pizza. Three want Chinese. And six can’t make up their minds. That’s basically what happened at the Federal Reserve this Wednesday.
The Fed cut interest rates by 0.25%, bringing them down to a range of 3.5%-3.75%. Sounds straightforward, right? Not even close. This was one of the messiest Fed meetings in years, with three officials actually voting against the decision. And here’s the kicker—they weren’t even disagreeing in the same direction. One wanted a bigger cut, while two wanted no cut at all.
Welcome to the most divided Federal Reserve we’ve seen since 2019.
But wait, what’s all the fuss about?
To understand why the Fed is having what amounts to a public argument, you need to know about their “dual mandate.” The Fed has two jobs: keep prices stable (fight inflation) and maximize employment (keep people working).
Usually, these two goals play nice together. But right now? They’re like siblings fighting in the backseat of a car.
On one side, inflation is still running hot at 2.8%—well above the Fed’s 2% target. On the other side, the job market is showing cracks. Hiring has slowed to levels not seen since early 2021. Companies aren’t firing people en masse, but they’re definitely not hiring either. Economists have a term for this: a “low hire, low fire” labor market.
Fed Chair Jerome Powell described it perfectly: “There’s no risk-free path for policy as we navigate this tension between our employment and inflation goals.”
So what do you do when you’re stuck between a rock and a hard place? Well, if you’re the Fed, you cut rates anyway and hope for the best.
The Messy Vote
Here’s where it gets interesting. The vote was 9-3, which might sound comfortable until you realize what those three “no” votes represented:
- Stephen Miran (Fed Governor): Wanted a bigger 0.5% cut to help the struggling job market
- Austan Goolsbee (Chicago Fed President): Wanted no cut because inflation is still too high
- Jeffrey Schmid (Kansas City Fed President): Also wanted no cut for the same reason
When’s the last time you saw hawks and doves (Fed-speak for inflation fighters and job market supporters) both disagree with the same decision? It’s like watching Manchester United and Liverpool fans agree that the referee is terrible, but for completely opposite reasons.
And it doesn’t stop there. Four other non-voting members also disagreed with the decision. Plus, seven officials think there should be zero rate cuts in 2026.
The Fed is basically a family dinner where nobody agrees on anything except that the situation is complicated.
The Data Problem
Now, you’d think the Fed could just look at the latest economic data and make a decision. But here’s the plot twist: they don’t have complete data.
Why? Because of the 43-day government shutdown that lasted from October through mid-November. Critical economic reports were delayed, meaning the Fed has been flying partially blind. Powell admitted they’ll have to look at incoming data “carefully and with a somewhat skeptical eye” because it might be distorted.
It’s like trying to navigate through fog while your GPS keeps buffering.
The Fed’s preferred inflation measure? Last reported in September—two months ago. Current job market data? Patchy at best, with some key reports missing entirely.
The Trump Factor
Oh, and there’s one more complication: the Fed chair musical chairs game.
Powell’s term expires in May 2026. President Trump has made it clear he wants someone who’ll cut rates more aggressively. Enter Kevin Hassett, Trump’s National Economic Council Director, who’s widely seen as the frontrunner for the job. Prediction markets give him a 72% chance of getting the nomination.
Just hours before Wednesday’s meeting, Hassett told Fox News he would have voted for a 0.5% cut if he were on the committee. Trump himself wasn’t shy either, saying the quarter-point cut was “a rather small” move that “could have been larger.”
So Powell is essentially making decisions while his potential replacement is publicly second-guessing him. Imagine giving a presentation at work while your incoming boss sits in the back row shaking their head.
What the Fed Is Really Signaling
Despite cutting rates, the Fed’s message was clear: don’t expect many more cuts anytime soon.
Their updated projections show just one more cut in 2026 and another in 2027. That’s it. Powell even dusted off language from last year’s December meeting—the exact same phrasing that preceded a nine-month pause in rate cuts.
Translation: “We’re done for now. Maybe we’ll reconsider in a few months. Don’t hold your breath.”
Powell was blunt: “We are well positioned to wait and see how the economy evolves.”
Wall Street got the message. Stocks rallied anyway—the Dow jumped 500 points—because investors realized the one thing they feared most (rate hikes) is off the table. Powell explicitly said raising rates isn’t in anyone’s base case right now.
The 2026 Crystal Ball
So what happens next year? Nobody really knows, and that’s the problem.
The Fed’s own projections are all over the place. Six policymakers don’t want any cuts this year. Seven don’t want any cuts in 2026. The “dot plot”—a chart showing where each Fed official thinks rates should go—looks like someone threw darts while blindfolded.
Art Hogan, chief market strategist at B Riley Wealth, summed it up: “I think the guessing game of what the Fed does next is going to be getting a lot more difficult next year.”
The variables are stacking up:
- Will inflation finally come down or stay sticky?
- Will the job market weaken further or stabilize?
- How much will Trump’s tariffs push up prices?
- What will the new Fed chair do differently?
- When will we get clean, reliable economic data again?
It’s like trying to predict the weather six months out during climate change. Good luck.
What This Means for You
Okay, enough Fed drama. What does this actually mean for regular people?
If you’re a borrower: Lower rates should eventually filter through to mortgages, car loans, and credit cards. Mortgage rates are already near their 2025 lows at around 6.19%. But don’t expect dramatic drops. With the Fed signaling a pause, rates might just stabilize rather than fall significantly.
If you’re a saver: Bad news. Your high-yield savings accounts and CDs will probably see their rates drift lower. If you’ve been sitting on cash earning 4-5%, those days might be numbered.
If you’re an investor: The stock market seems fine with modest rate cuts and no hikes. Some strategists are even saying they hope there aren’t more cuts in 2026 because that would mean the economy is weakening. As Chris Grisanti from MAI Capital Management put it: “I’d rather have a solid economy and no more cuts.”
The Bottom Line
The Fed is stuck in an uncomfortable spot, trying to support a softening job market without letting inflation get out of control. They’re divided, they’re uncertain, and they’re about to get a new leader who might have very different ideas.
For investors and regular folks trying to plan their finances, the message is frustratingly unclear: rates will probably stay roughly where they are for a while, but everything could change depending on data we don’t have yet.
The one certainty? 2026 is going to be one wild ride for monetary policy.
As Powell said in what might be one of his final meetings as chair: “I really want to turn this job over to whoever replaces me with the economy in really good shape.”
Let’s see if he can pull it off with his divided, data-deprived, and debating Fed committee.
What do you think? Is the Fed making the right call by cutting rates while inflation is still elevated? Or should they be more aggressive given the softening job market? The Fed officials can’t agree—maybe you can help settle the debate.
