Skip to content 
How a scrappy AI startup’s dream exit turned into a geopolitical flashpoint
Here is a story about a startup, a blockbuster acquisition, and a government that decided it was not quite done with either of them.
Cast your mind back to March 2025. A little-known Chinese AI company called Manus launches a product that breaks the internet. It showcases what people in the industry call “agentic” AI — software that does not just answer your questions but actually goes out and does things for you. Books appointments. Writes code. Manages files. The whole deal.
The hype was immediate and intense. Invitation codes to access the product were trading for as much as $15,000 on secondary markets. A million people joined the waitlist overnight. For a brief moment, Manus was the most talked about AI company on the planet.
Then came the critics. They called it a “wrapper” — a product that was essentially just stitching together models built by Anthropic and Alibaba without any real proprietary technology underneath. The buzz cooled. But the business did not. Revenue climbed to nearly $100 million, subscriptions kept rolling in, and Benchmark, one of Silicon Valley’s most respected venture firms, led a $75 million funding round valuing the company at $500 million.
By June 2025, the founders made a decision that would set everything else in motion. They shut down China operations, relocated the core team to Singapore, and reoriented the company toward international capital and US-developed AI models. Chinese social media was not pleased. “Manus abandons its home country after leveraging cheap and quality Chinese engineers,” read one widely shared post on Weibo.
Regulators in Beijing reviewed the move at the time and concluded it was fine. The company did not possess core technology under export controls, they said. Its capabilities could be replicated. Nothing to see here.
That judgment, it turns out, would come back to haunt them.
In December 2025, Meta swooped in and agreed to acquire Manus for $2 billion. The deal came together in under two weeks from first contact, which is unusually fast even by Silicon Valley standards. Neither Meta nor Manus informed Chinese regulators before the announcement. The acquisition was initially celebrated as a rare win — a Chinese-founded startup finding a massive exit through a US buyer despite all the regulatory noise.
The celebration did not last long.
A few days after the announcement, China’s Ministry of Commerce began a preliminary review. Early assessments found no clear violations. But then China’s National Security Commission — a body chaired by President Xi Jinping himself — stepped in. Its verdict was blunt. The deal was “conspiratorial,” an attempt to hollow out China’s technology base. That report was circulated among senior Communist Party leaders and triggered a full-scale multi-agency review involving the NDRC, the commerce ministry, and the antitrust watchdog.
Officials who had earlier cleared Manus’s Singapore relocation now found themselves under pressure to “correct” their earlier judgment.
In March 2026, the two co-founders were summoned by the NDRC and subsequently barred from leaving China. Meta, meanwhile, had already integrated Manus into its advertising tools and onboarded the startup’s employees into its Singapore offices. Investors including Tencent and Hongshan had already received their proceeds.
Then came the final blow. On a Monday in late April, the NDRC issued a one-line statement: foreign investment in Manus was prohibited. The acquisition was to be cancelled.
The order raises an obvious question: how exactly do you unwind a deal that is already done? Employees have moved. Money has changed hands. Products have been integrated. People familiar with the situation suggest the announcement may be as much about signaling as enforcement — a warning shot aimed at any other startup thinking about following the same playbook. As one person close to the matter put it, the gesture was “pretty harsh” and was really intended to “stop follow-on deals.”
Meta responded diplomatically, saying the transaction complied with applicable law and expressing hope for an appropriate resolution.
Beijing’s broader message is harder to misread. In recent weeks, major Chinese AI firms including Moonshot AI, Stepfun, and ByteDance have been told they should reject US-origin capital in future funding rounds unless explicitly approved by regulators. The era of Chinese startups freely incorporating offshore, raising American money, and eventually selling to US buyers is being shut down.
There is a certain irony at the heart of all this. The US has spent years using export controls to limit China’s access to chips and AI models. Now China is doing the same thing in reverse — restricting American access to AI talent and technology developed on its soil, even when that talent has long since moved abroad.
The Manus story did not end as anyone expected. Not for the founders currently barred from leaving the country. Not for Meta, which paid $2 billion for something it may have to hand back. And certainly not for the generation of Chinese AI founders who watched this unfold and are now quietly reconsidering their own exit strategies.
Blog banner image source – Google Gemini
